These rules take effect on November 1, 2021. They govern civil cases filed on or after that date. For actions pending on November 1, 2021, if fewer than ten days remain to perform an act otherwise governed by these rules, the provisions of the local rules that were in effect on October 31, 2021, shall apply to that act.
Failure by counsel or a party to comply with any duly promulgated local rule or any Federal Rule may be a ground for imposition of any authorized sanction.
Commentary
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f).
(o) Standing Orders of Individual Judges. “Standing Orders” are orders by a Judge governing the conduct of a class or category of actions or proceedings assigned to that Judge. It is the policy of the Court to provide notice of any applicable Standing Orders to parties before they are subject to sanctions for violating such orders. Nothing in these local rules precludes a Judge from issuing Standing Orders to govern matters not covered by these local rules or by the Federal Rules.
The Court shall be in continuous session in the following locations: San Francisco Division, Oakland Division, San Jose Division, and Eureka Division. From time to time sessions may be held at other locations within the district as the Court may order.
Cross Reference
See Civil L.R. 3-6(b) “Jury Demand; Marking of Civil Cover Sheet Insufficient;”
Civil L.R. 3-7(a) “Civil Cover Sheet Requirement in Private Securities Actions”
Cross Reference
See General Order No. 44 “Assignment Plan.”
Cross Reference
See Civil L.R. 3-9 “Parties”; Civil L. R. 3-11 “Failure to Notify of Address Change;”
and Civil L.R. 11-3(e) “Appearances and Service on Local Co-Counsel.”
(2) If not proceeding pro se and if proceeding pro hac vice in conformity with Civil L.R. 11-3, following the information required in Civil L.R. 3-4(a)(1), the name, address, telephone and state bar number of the member of the bar of the Court who maintains an office within the State of California; and
Commentary
See Wall v. Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp., 718 F.2d 906, 909 (9th Cir. 1983) (holding that “checking the jury demand box on the civil cover sheet is insufficient to meet the requirements of rule 38(b)”).
Cross Reference
See Civil L.R. 23-1 “Private Securities Actions.”
Cross Reference
See also Civil L.R. 23 “Class Actions.”
Cross Reference See 28 U.S.C. § 2403.
Cross Reference
See Civil L.R. 11-1 “The Bar of this Court.”
Cross Reference
See Civil L.R. 11-1 “The Bar of this Court.”
Cross Reference
See Civil L.R. 11-2 “Attorneys for the United States.” See also ADR L.R. 5-10(a)(2) and 6-9(a)(2).
Commentary
If, during the pendency of an action, any person wishes to prosecute or defend an action in forma pauperis, the person must file an Administrative Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11.
Whenever an affidavit of bias or prejudice directed at a Judge of this Court is filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 144, and the Judge has determined not to recuse him or herself and found that the affidavit is neither legally insufficient nor interposed for delay, the Judge shall refer the request for disqualification to the Clerk for random assignment to another Judge.
Commentary
Recusal under 28 U.S.C. § 455 is normally undertaken by a Judge sua sponte. However, counsel may bring the issue to a Judge’s attention by formal motion or raise it informally at a Case Management Conference or by a letter to the Judge, with a copy to the other parties in the case. This rule does not preclude a Judge from referring matters arising under 28 U.S.C. § 455 to the Clerk so that another Judge can determine disqualification. See also Civil L.R. 3-15.
Except for service on behalf of the United States or as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(2), or unless the Court orders otherwise for good cause shown, service of summons in a civil action shall not be made by the United States Marshal.
Commentary
28 U.S.C. § 566(c) provides that the United States Marshal shall execute writs, process and orders issued under the authority of the United States.
Along with the complaint and the summons or request for waiver of service, a party subject to Civil L.R. 16-2(a), (b), or (c), must serve the following Supplementary Material:
Commentary
Procedures and instructions for using the Court’s ECF system consistent with these policies may be found on the Court’s ECF webpage at cand.uscourts.gov/cases-e-filing/cm-ecf/. In addition to providing access to filing and retrieval of documents, the ECF webpage also contains instructions, a user manual, tutorials, an extensive listing of Frequently Asked Questions (“FAQs”), and information regarding changes in the ECF system, among other items. The initial point of contact for anyone having trouble filing a document on the ECF system is the email address or toll-free number posted on the Court’s ECF webpage.
Cross Reference
See Civil L.R. 5-1(i) for rules governing the filing of documents with signatures other than those of the e-filer.
Commentary
In addition to receiving email notifications of filing activity, parties are encouraged to check the docket in their case on the ECF system at regular intervals.
Some types of documents shall only be filed manually and not electronically unless specifically authorized by the Court. A list of such documents may be found on the ECF webpage. Such documents shall be manually filed with the Clerk and served upon the parties in accordance with the applicable Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and Local Rules for filing and service of paper documents. Parties manually filing a document shall file electronically a Manual Filing Notification.
Proposed orders submitted by an ECF user in an ECF case shall be filed in PDF format, and attached to the applicable motion or other document. In addition, proposed orders shall be submitted in a standard word processing format (such as Microsoft Word) to the specific address on the Court’s website for emailing proposed orders to the assigned Judge. Proposed orders must conform to the requirements of the assigned Judge’s standing orders.
Cross Reference
See Civil L.R. 7-3 for rules for calculating due dates for opposition and reply briefs.
(c) Filing Date of Drop Box Documents. Before a document is deposited in a drop box for filing, the back side of the last page of the document must be stamped “Received” using the device available at the drop box.
Commentary
Questions regarding availability and use of the drop box should be directed to the Clerk. The Clerk’s Office policy is to empty and lock the drop box at the beginning of each day when the Clerk’s Office opens. When the Clerk’s Office closes, the drop box is reopened so that it may be used again for filing.
Cross Reference
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d).
Commentary
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1, except for civil complaints and other case-initiating documents in civil cases, parties are not required to include a certificate or acknowledgment of service upon registered ECF users when a document is filed electronically. Notification to those parties will be provided by the Court’s electronic filing system.
Commentary
The time periods set forth in Civil L.R. 7-2 and 7-3 regarding notice, response, and reply to motions are minimum time periods. For complex motions, parties are encouraged to stipulate to or seek a Court order establishing a longer notice period with correspondingly longer periods for response or reply. See Civil L.R. 1-4 and 1-5.
Cross Reference
See Civil L.R. 7-11 regarding request to exceed page limitations.
Commentary
Although Civil L.R. 7-4(b) limits briefs to 25 pages of text, counsel should not consider this a minimum as well as a maximum limit. Briefs with less than 25 pages of text may be excessive in length for the nature of the issues addressed.
No oral testimony will be received in connection with any motion, unless otherwise ordered by the assigned Judge.
Any motion for sanctions, regardless of the sources of authority invoked, must comply with the following:
Cross Reference
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) regarding discretion of Court to reconsider its orders prior to entry of final judgment.
Commentary
This local rule does not apply to motions for reconsideration of a Magistrate Judge’s order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). See Civil L.R. 72.
Unless otherwise ordered by the assigned Judge, a party may file an ex parte motion, that is, a motion filed without notice to opposing party, only if a statute, Federal Rule, local rule, or Standing Order authorizes ex parte filing. The motion must include a citation to the statute, rule, or order which permits the use of an ex parte motion to obtain the relief sought.
Cross Reference
See, e.g., Civil L.R. 65-1 “Temporary Restraining Orders.”
The Court recognizes that during the course of case proceedings a party may require a Court order with respect to miscellaneous administrative matters, not otherwise governed by a federal statute, Federal Rule, local rule, or standing order of the assigned Judge. These motions would include matters such as motions to exceed otherwise applicable page limitations or motions to file documents under seal, for example.
Every stipulation requesting judicial action must be in writing signed by all affected parties or their counsel. A proposed form of order may be submitted with the stipulation and may consist of an endorsement on the stipulation of the words, “PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED,” with spaces designated for the date and the signature of the Judge.
Whenever any motion or other matter has been under submission for more than 120 days, a party, individually or jointly with another party, may file with the Court a notice that the matter remains under submission, or may ask the Northern District of California Ombudsperson to provide such notice to the Court. If judicial action is not taken, subsequent notices may be filed at the expiration of each 120-day period thereafter until a ruling is made.
This rule does not preclude a party from filing an earlier notice if it is warranted by the nature of the matter under submission (e.g., motion for extraordinary relief).
Cross Reference
See Civil L.R. 3-4(e) “Prohibition of Citation to Uncertified Opinion or Order.”
Any party filing or moving to file an amended pleading must reproduce the entire proposed pleading and may not incorporate any part of a prior pleading by reference.
11. AttorneysAn attorney employed or retained by the United States government or any of its agencies may, without satisfying the membership requirements of LR 11-1, practice in this Court in all actions or proceedings within the scope of his or her employment or retention by the United States.
This disqualification shall not be applicable if the pro hac vice applicant (i) has been a resident of California for less than one year; (ii) has registered with, and completed all required applications for admission to, the State Bar of California; and (iii) has officially registered to take or is awaiting results from the California State Bar exam.
Commentary
The California Standards of Professional Conduct are contained in the State Bar Act, the Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of California, and decisions of any court applicable thereto.
Commentary
This rule is not intended to prohibit communications with Court staff regarding scheduling or general case management.
Cross Reference
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(c), 16(f), 37.
A person who exercises, or pretends to be entitled to exercise, any of the privileges of membership in the bar of this Court, when that person is not entitled to exercise such privileges, may be referred to the Standing Committee in addition to any action authorized by applicable law.
“Scheduling,” “discovery,” or “status” conferences under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 and 26 shall be designated as “case management conferences” in this Court. All statements, proposed orders, or other documents prepared in connection with such conferences must be referred to as such.
Unless otherwise ordered, the conferring and planning that is mandated by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and by ADR Local Rule 3-5 must be done by lead trial counsel for each party.
Appeals from the United States Bankruptcy Court to the United States District Court are governed by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and the Bankruptcy Local Rules of this district.
Cross Reference
See Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8001 through 8020 and B.L.R. 8001-1 through 8011-1.
In actions for District Court review on an administrative record (except cases governed by the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)) , the defendant must serve and file an answer, together with a certified copy of the transcript of the administrative record, within 90 days of receipt of service of the summons and complaint. Within 28 days of receipt of defendant’s answer, plaintiff must file a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-2 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. Defendant must serve and file any opposition or counter-motion within 28 days of service of plaintiff’s motion. Plaintiff may serve and file a reply within 14 days after service of defendant’s opposition or counter-motion. Unless the Court orders otherwise, upon the conclusion of this briefing schedule, the matter will be deemed submitted for decision by the District Court without oral argument.
Cross Reference
See Civil L.R. 3-12(h), “Relating Actions for Review on an Administrative Record”.
These cases shall proceed as follows:
Unless otherwise provided in these local rules, in categories of cases that are exempted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(B) from the initial disclosure requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1), promptly after the commencement of the action the assigned Judge will schedule a Case Management Conference or issue a case management order without such conference. Discovery shall proceed in such cases only at the time, and to the extent, authorized by the Judge in the case management order.
Counsel must further certify that they have discussed selection of an ADR process and an appropriate deadline for an ADR session with counsel for the other parties to the case and shall indicate whether they intend to stipulate to an ADR process and deadline or prefer to discuss ADR selection with the assigned Judge at the case management conference.
Cross Reference
See Civil L.R. 3-7 “Civil Cover Sheet and Certification in Private Securities Actions.”
The party propounding interrogatories, requests for production of documents, or requests for admission must retain the original of the discovery request and the original response. That party shall be the custodian of these materials. Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(f) identifies the custodian of the original transcript or recording of a deposition.
Commentary
Counsel should consider stipulating to sharing computer-readable copies of discovery requests, such as interrogatories and requests for production of documents, as well as responses to such requests, to save costs and to facilitate expeditious pretrial discovery.
For the convenience of witnesses, counsel, and parties, before noticing a deposition of a party or witness affiliated with a party, the noticing party must confer about the scheduling of the deposition with opposing counsel or, if the party is pro se, the party. A party noticing a deposition of a witness who is not a party or affiliated with a party must also meet and confer about scheduling, but may do so after serving the nonparty witness with a subpoena.
Answers and objections to interrogatories must set forth each question in full before each answer or objection.
A demand that a party set forth the basis for a denial of an admission requested under Fed. R. Civ. P. 36 will be treated as a separate discovery request (an interrogatory) and is allowable only to the extent that a party is entitled to propound additional interrogatories.
Cross Reference
To the same effect, see Civil L.R. 36-2. Commentary
Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 36, a party is not required to set forth the basis for an unqualified denial.
A motion for leave to propound more interrogatories than permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 33 must be accompanied by a memorandum which sets forth each proposed additional interrogatory and explains in detail why it is necessary to propound the additional questions.
34. PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND THINGSA response to a request for production or inspection made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(a) must set forth each request in full before each response or objection.
36. REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONResponses to requests for admission must set forth each request in full before each response or objection.
A demand that a party set forth the basis for a denial of a requested admission will be treated as a separate discovery request (an interrogatory) and is allowable only to the extent that a party is entitled to propound additional interrogatories.
Cross Reference
To the same effect, see Civil L.R. 33-2. Commentary
Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 36, a party is not required to set forth the basis for an unqualified denial.
In addition to complying with applicable provisions of Civil L.R. 7, a motion to compel further responses to discovery requests must set forth each request in full, followed immediately by the objections and/or responses thereto. For each such request, the moving papers must detail the basis for the party’s contention that it is entitled to the requested discovery and must show how the proportionality and other requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(2) are satisfied.
Unless otherwise ordered, as used in any order of this Court or in these Local Rules, a “discovery cut-off” is the date by which all responses to written discovery are due and by which all depositions must be concluded.
Where the Court has set a single discovery cut-off for both fact and expert discovery, no discovery-related motions may be filed more than 7 days after the discovery cut-off.
Where the Court has set separate deadlines for fact and expert discovery, no motions related to fact discovery may be filed more than 7 days after the fact discovery cut-off, and no motions related to expert discovery may be filed more than 7 days after the expert discovery cut-off.
Discovery requests that call for responses or depositions after the applicable discovery cut-off are not enforceable, except by order of the Court for good cause shown.
Commentary
Counsel should initiate discovery requests and notice depositions sufficiently in advance of the cut-off date to comply with this local rule. “Discovery-related motions” encompasses all motions relating to discovery, including motions to compel or protect against discovery, motions regarding the duty to preserve documents, including spoliation motions, motions to quash or enforce subpoenas, and motions for discovery sanctions.
When, in connection with a dispute about disclosure or discovery, a party moves for an award of attorney fees or other form of sanction under Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, the motion must:
No continuance of a scheduled trial date will be granted except by order of the Court issued in response to a motion made in accordance with the provisions of Civil L.R. 7. Failure of a party to proceed with the trial on the scheduled trial date may result in the assessment of jury costs and the imposition of appropriate sanctions, including dismissal or entry of default. Jury costs may be also assessed for failure to provide the Court with timely notice of a settlement.
Commentary
Counsel should consult any Standing Orders issued by the assigned Judge with respect to the conduct of trial. Such orders are available on the individual Judges’ pages of the Court’s website: cand.uscourts.gov/judges.
Commentary
The 14-day time period set by this rule is inapplicable where a statute authorizing costs establishes a different time deadline, (e.g., 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(B) (setting 30 days from final judgment as time limit to file for fees under Equal Access to Justice Act)).
Commentary
Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(2)(B) sets a time period of 14 days from the entry of judgment to file a motion for attorney’s fees. Counsel who desire to seek an order extending the time to file such a motion, either by stipulation (See Civil L.R. 6-2) or by motion (See Civil L.R. 6-3), are advised to seek such an order as expeditiously as practicable.
Motions for summary judgment or summary adjudication and opposition to such motions must be noticed as provided in Civil L.R. 7-2 and 7-3.
Statements contained in an order of the Court denying a motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication shall not constitute issues deemed established for purposes of the trial of the case, unless the Court so specifies.
65. INJUNCTIONSMotions for preliminary injunctions unaccompanied by a temporary restraining order are governed by Civil L.R. 7-2.
65.1 SECURITYThe receiver may not employ an attorney, accountant, or investigator without a Court order. The compensation of all such employees shall be fixed by the Court.
All motions for fees for services rendered in connection with a receivership must set forth in reasonable detail the nature of the services. The motion must include as an exhibit an itemized record of time spent and services rendered.
A receiver must deposit all funds received into the institution selected by the Court as its designated depository pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2041. The account title shall include the case name and number. At the end of each month, the receiver must deliver to the Clerk a statement of account, copies of canceled checks, and any other records of transactions.
Within 30 days of appointment, a permanent receiver must serve and file with the Court a verified report and petition for instructions. The report and petition must contain a summary of the operations of the receiver, an inventory of the assets and their appraised value, a schedule of all receipts and disbursements, and a list of all creditors, their addresses and the amounts of their claims. The petition must contain the receiver’s recommendation as to the continuance of the receivership and reasons therefor. At the hearing, the Judge will determine whether the receivership will be continued and, if so, will set a schedule for future reports of the receiver.
The receiver must give all interested parties notice of the time and place of hearings of the following in accordance with Civil L.R. 7-2:
Each Magistrate Judge appointed by the Court is authorized to exercise all powers and perform all duties conferred upon Magistrate Judges by 28 U.S.C. § 636, by the local rules of this Court, and by any written order of a District Judge designating a Magistrate Judge to perform specific statutorily authorized duties in a particular action.
Commentary
Procedures governing review of a pretrial order by a Magistrate Judge on matters not dispositive of a claim or defense are governed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). Procedures governing consideration of a Magistrate Judge’s findings, report and recommendations on pretrial matters dispositive of a claim or defense are governed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) & (C).
Commentary
See Civil L.R. 5-4 regarding after-hours drop box filing.
The Clerk is authorized to sign and enter orders specifically allowed to be signed by the Clerk under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and these local rules. The Clerk may file such orders as effective on a previous date when appropriate and as permitted by law. In addition, the Clerk may sign and enter the following orders without further direction of a Judge:
Cross Reference
See ADR L.R. 4-11(d) “Nonbinding Arbitration; Entry of Judgment on Award.”
Commentary
The Judicial Conference of the United States has published a policy against the video “broadcast” of court proceedings. This appears intended to apply to hearings where remote video access is provided over a platform such as Zoom. This policy is not binding on the courts; it is a recommendation that is owed respectful consideration. See 28 U.S.C. § 331; Hollingsworth v. Perry, 558 U.S. 183, 193 (2010); see also, e.g., United States v. Slone, 969 F. Supp. 2d 830, 834–35 (E.D. Ky. 2013); United States v. Crusius, 2020 WL 4340550, at *6 (W.D. Tex. July 28, 2020). The Judicial Conference policy approves providing remote audio access to civil and bankruptcy hearings that do not involve witness testimony. The Judicial Council of the Ninth Circuit, whose policies are binding within the Circuit, has left the decision about whether and how to provide remote video access to the district courts.
This Court has carefully considered the recommendation of the Judicial Conference but has determined based on its own experience from 2020 to 2023 that, except in very rare circumstances, providing the media and the public with remote video access improves transparency and confidence in judicial proceedings without having any negative effect on those proceedings. Additionally, the public’s interest in access to the courts is better served by providing video access as opposed to audio‐only access, particularly in cases where the judge and attorneys are also appearing remotely rather than from the courtroom.
The following media are designated by this Court as its official means of giving public notice of calendars, General Orders, employment opportunities, policies, proposed modifications of these local rules, or any matter requiring public notice. The Court may designate any one or a combination of these media for purposes of giving notice as it deems appropriate:
The Court, or any Judge, may from time to time make such orders or impose such requirements as may be reasonably necessary to assure the security of the Court and of all persons in attendance.
The Court maintains a law library primarily for the use of Judges and personnel of the Court. In addition, attorneys admitted to practice in this Court may use the library as needed for actions or proceedings pending in the Court. The library is operated in accordance with such rules and regulations as the Court may from time to time adopt.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 351(a), any person alleging that a Judge of this Court has engaged in conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the Court, or alleging that a Judge is unable to discharge all of the duties of office by reason of mental or physical disability, may file with the Clerk of the Court for the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit a written complaint containing a brief statement of the facts constituting such conduct. Upon request, the Clerk of this Court will provide to any person wishing to file such a complaint:
If a party timely orders a transcript in accordance with the requirements of Fed. R. App. P. 10(b), but fails to make satisfactory arrangements to pay the court reporter at or before the time of the order, the court reporter must promptly notify the Clerk of Court and the party. Within 14 days after receipt of such notice from the court reporter, the party ordering the transcript must make satisfactory arrangements for payment. The reporters’ transcript must be filed within 28 days of the date such arrangements have been made. If the party fails to make satisfactory arrangements for payment within 14 days, the Clerk of Court shall certify to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit that the party has failed to comply with Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(4).
Cross Reference
See Ninth Circuit Rule 10-3 “Ordering the Reporter’s Transcript.”
The Clerk will not include in the record on appeal the following items unless their inclusion is specifically requested in writing and supported by a brief statement of the reason therefor:
All files of the Court shall remain in the custody of the Clerk. The “original copy” of a document filed via ECF is the electronic file stored on ECF. Physical documents belonging to the files of the Court may be taken from the custody of the Clerk only in extraordinary circumstances, by special order of a Judge and with a proper receipt signed by the person obtaining the record or document.
Motions to seal entire pleadings or briefs are strongly disfavored and will be granted only in extraordinary circumstances.
The local rules of this Court may be modified or amended by a majority vote of the active Judges of the Court in accordance with the procedures set forth in this rule. New rules may be proposed or existing rules may be amended at the suggestion of any judge or member of the public, and will generally be vetted by the Local Rules Committee, which will make a recommendation to the Court before a vote is taken. Attorney Advisory Committees will be appointed to advise and assist the Court when called upon to do so by the Local Rules Committee.